Voting Rights Restoration
Can I Vote if My State Does Not Automatically Restore My Voting Rights?
Michelle Cirocco
It's worth the effort to petition to regain your franchise. Voting is important for your reintegration, your self advocacy, and to establish a tradition of civic participation for those you care about.
The Path to the Polls After Prison
The majority of states automatically permit American citizens to vote after they have served their time for felony convictions. Election officials are notified that these returning citizens have regained their ability to participate in elections if that right had been suspended.
These potential voters will need to register, or re-register, to get set up to cast their ballots. In some states, they may be required to pay certain fees and fines, or to make financial restitution, before suffrage can be restored.
Can you regain the right to vote in a state that does not automatically restore rights? Yes, you may be eligible after fulfilling specific requirements and gaining state approval.
Meet Michelle Cirocco - She did not give up when her restoration petition was denied.
Michelle Cirocco is the CEO of Televerde Foundation and Chief Impact Officer for Televerde. She joined Televerde in 1999 and has held several leadership positions, including Chief Marketing Officer. Michelle earned her MBA from Arizona State University, where she also serves on the Dean’s Advisory Council.
An avid TED fan, she organized and hosted TEDxPerryvilleCorrectional, the first TEDx to be held in an Arizona prison. The event looked behind the curtain of incarceration to show the potential of providing second chances. Michelle is deeply committed to supporting justice reform, serving as an ambassador for Represent Justice. She also plays an active role in the Responsible Business Initiative for Justice as a member of its Advisory Council, contributes her expertise as a board member of the Sixth Amendment Center, and is on the boards of both Conscious Capitalism and Women in Revenue.
Michelle Cirocco regained her right to vote in 2022 with the help of an attorney after her first petition was unsuccessful. She joins U.S. Vote Foundation (US Vote) to demonstrate how to navigate the process and why, indeed, returning citizens should persist in restoring this fundamental right.
US.VOTE
Thanks for joining us, Michelle. Let’s start our discussion of your voter journey on the day you cast your restored vote some three decades after the first and only time you had ever voted in 1992. Can you describe how you felt to have participated in an election after all those years?
Michelle Cirocco
Thank you for having me. The day I cast my restored vote was incredibly emotional. I felt a mixture of excitement, pride, and even a bit of nervousness.
It wasn’t just about checking a box on a ballot; it was about reclaiming a piece of my identity and my rights as a citizen. Voting after all those years symbolized the culmination of my journey from incarceration to reintegration. It was a powerful reminder that no matter how far I had come, I was still part of the democratic process, and my voice mattered. It felt like I was finally back where I belonged, as a full participant in the community, contributing to the decisions that shape our society.
US.VOTE
When you first voted in 1992, you were so young. Can you tell us a bit about how you felt seeing your own children come of age politically when your own voting rights had not yet been restored?
Michelle Cirocco
Seeing my children come of age politically while my own voting rights were still stripped away was both heartbreaking and eye-opening. I realized that because I couldn't vote, I had inadvertently raised children who didn't engage in voting either. My inability to participate in the democratic process had created a disconnect, where my children grew up seeing voting as something that didn’t apply to them.
This was one of the hardest parts of losing my rights—knowing that it had ripple effects on the next generation. It underscored for me just how critical it is to restore voting rights, not just for the individual, but for the broader impact it has on families and communities. Restoring those rights is about more than just casting a ballot; it’s about reconnecting with our civic duties and ensuring that future generations understand and exercise their own rights.
US.VOTE
Let’s go back in time to your initial effort to get your voting rights back. You live in a state that does not automatically restore voting rights. Can you break down the Arizona law on voting restoration for us?
Michelle Cirocco
When I initially sought to restore my voting rights in Arizona, the process was quite involved since the state does not automatically restore these rights. Here's a breakdown of how it works:
For individuals with a single felony conviction, Arizona law is relatively straightforward. Once you’ve completed all terms of your sentence, including probation and paying any fines or restitution, your civil rights, including the right to vote, are automatically restored.
For individuals with multiple felony convictions, restoring voting rights in Arizona is notably more complex. In this case, you must actively apply to restore your voting rights. This involves submitting an application to the judge who initially sentenced you. If that judge is unavailable, you can submit it to another judge in the same court. The application includes details about your convictions and confirmation that you’ve completed all terms of your sentence, including financial obligations.
Once the application is submitted, the court reviews it and may hold a hearing. The judge will consider various factors, such as the nature of your offenses, your behavior since the convictions, and your efforts toward rehabilitation. It's important to note that the decision to restore your voting rights is at the judge’s discretion.
If your application is denied, it's not the end of the road. You do have options. You can reapply after a certain period, or once you’ve met additional conditions set by the court.
Look, the process is daunting! Our laws should aim to support reintegration and civic engagement, but instead, they create barriers. The need for legal assistance is significant and expensive!
US.VOTE
That is indeed a complex process. Which aspects of this experience do you find most challenging?
Michelle Cirocco
One of the biggest challenges returning citizens face is financial obligations. Many individuals re-entering society struggle to meet these requirements because their immediate priorities are basic needs like rent, food, and childcare. Additionally, finding meaningful work above low-wage, low-skill jobs is tough, making it nearly impossible to save money to pay off fines and restitution.
It often feels like the system is intentionally designed to make the restoration of rights out of reach for most. Addressing these barriers is essential to creating a fair and just process that genuinely supports individuals in reclaiming their rights and becoming active, contributing members of society.
US.VOTE
You ultimately decided to hire an attorney to petition a second time after your initial application was not granted. How did you come to that decision and how did you go about selecting an attorney?
Michelle Cirocco
The decision to hire an attorney came after a lot of reflection and frustration with the initial denial. I knew that regaining my voting rights was too important to leave to chance.
After the first petition was denied, I realized that I needed someone who could navigate the legal system more effectively than I could on my own. I started by researching attorneys who had experience with voting rights restoration and civil rights cases. I wanted someone who not only understood the legal process but also believed in the importance of the work we were doing. I asked for recommendations, did my homework on their track records, and ultimately chose someone who I felt was both highly qualified and personally invested in my case. It was a decision based on the belief that with the right legal support, we could overcome the obstacles that had previously stood in the way.
US.VOTE
Do you think having legal representation made the difference with your second petition? Were there other factors such as the evolution of public perspective?
Michelle Cirocco
I absolutely believe that having legal representation made a significant difference in my second petition. My attorney brought a level of expertise and advocacy that was crucial in navigating the complexities of the legal system. They were able to present my case in a way that was both compelling and legally sound, which I believe helped to shift the perspective of those reviewing it.
That said, I also think the broader evolution of public perspective played a role. Over the years, there has been growing recognition of the importance of restoring rights to those who have served their sentences and reintegrated into society. This shift in public opinion, along with increased awareness about the barriers that people like me face, likely contributed to a more favorable outcome. It felt like the tide was turning, and the combination of skilled legal representation and a more understanding societal context made all the difference.
US.VOTE
I think your voter journey will resonate with a lot of people. First, because it feels so relatable that you had other priorities on your list - getting a job, finding a place to live, raising your kids - all of this compounded by your experience overcoming the stigma of incarceration.
But second, your journey resonates because you persisted. It’s powerful to learn about the deepening of your civic connection and the strengthening of your resolve. You may inspire others to take their own steps to regain their franchise. What would you say to these potential voters?
Michelle Cirocco
To those potential voters who may feel overwhelmed by regaining their voting rights, I want to say that your journey, no matter how challenging, is incredibly important and worth every effort. I completely understand that restoring your voting rights might seem like a low priority when you’re trying to find a job, secure housing, and provide for your family. But let me assure you, your voice matters.
Persisting through these obstacles is about affirming your place in society and participating in shaping the community in which you live, not to mention changing these horrible laws! The road will be tough, and you will feel like the system is stacked against you. But every step you take toward restoring your rights is a step toward empowerment and positive change.
My journey was filled with setbacks and frustrations, but it also deepened my connection to my community and strengthened my resolve. I found that regaining my right to vote was never just about casting a ballot—it was about standing up and being counted, about having a say in the decisions that affect my life and the lives of my loved ones.
To those considering taking this step, reach out for support. Some organizations and individuals can help guide you through the process, provide legal assistance, and offer the encouragement you need to keep going. Remember, you’re not alone in this journey.
Your vote is your voice, and it has the power to contribute. Don’t let the barriers deter you. Remember: Every step you take toward regaining your voting rights is a victory for you and our democracy.
US.VOTE
And what message would you want to share with policy makers? Or with Americans who are learning about or advocating for voter restoration?
Michelle Cirocco
When addressing policymakers and Americans advocating for voter restoration, my message is grounded in the fundamental belief that voting is a right for all, including those who have served their time. Voting is a cornerstone of our democracy. Denying this right to fellow Americans who happen to have a crime in their past undermines the very principles our nation was built upon.
Firstly, I would emphasize to policymakers the importance of recognizing the transformative power of voting. Voting is a civic duty and a critical step in reintegrating individuals into society. Studies have shown that voters are more likely to feel connected to their communities and less likely to re-offend. Thus, granting rights is not merely fostering a safer, more inclusive society and creating a stronger democracy where every voice is heard.
Policymakers must also understand that using this population for political gain is unjust and short-sighted. As elected officials, they represent all of us, even those with rocky pasts. By restoring voting rights, they offer a hand-up to individuals striving to rebuild their lives.
I would stress the importance of empathy and understanding to Americans learning about or advocating for voter restoration. Many people re-entering society after incarceration face significant hurdles, from finding employment to reconnecting with family. Allowing them to vote can provide a sense of belonging and purpose. It's about giving them a voice in issues that impact them and a stake in their communities.
I would call on all of us to challenge the misconceptions and stigmas associated with men and women with criminal backgrounds. These individuals have paid their debt to society and deserve a second chance. Restoring their voting rights, we acknowledge their humanity and potential to contribute positively to our communities.
Ultimately, this is a matter of justice, rehabilitation, and the belief that people can change. Voting should not be a privilege reserved for a select few but a fundamental right accessible to all citizens. By advocating for voter restoration, we are upholding the principles of democracy and paving the way for a more just and inclusive society.
US Vote's Voter Accounts are a useful resource for justice impacted citizens seeking to securely store the information you need for voting with convenient access. With a few clicks, you can generate the forms you need to register or request an absentee ballot for any election wherever you are. You can also sign up for reminders when an election is coming up so that you don't miss out on voting.